Multiple Linear Regression Excel

This guide treats “multiple linear regression excel” the way busy spreadsheet users actually want it: answer first, a live tool to prove it on your own data, then the reasoning. It is written for Excel but calls out every place Google Sheets differs, and the platform toggle at the top switches all shortcuts between Windows and Mac so nothing here assumes the keyboard you are not on.

Exact answer

In Excel: enable the Analysis ToolPak and use Data ▸ Data Analysis ▸ Regression, or get the same coefficients as a formula with LINEST.

ƒxCorrelation & TrendlineLive

6 pairs

Correlation (r)
0.9981

R² = 0.9962

Slope
1.9857

Intercept = 0.1667

=CORREL(A2:A10,B2:B10) · =SLOPE(B,A) · =RSQ()
=LINEST(B2:B50,C2:D50,TRUE,TRUE)
Ctrl+CthenCtrl+Shift+V+Cthen+Ctrl+VPaste values · WindowsMac

What this does

Regression fits a straight-line relationship between one outcome column and one or more predictor columns. The ToolPak produces a full report — coefficients, their standard errors, t statistics and p-values, R squared, and the F test for the model as a whole. LINEST returns the same numbers as a spilled array without the report layout. Both require the predictor columns to be contiguous. Most people learn this as a sequence of clicks and forget it by next week; learning it as a pattern instead is what lets you apply it to the next, slightly different version of the problem without starting from scratch. That is the difference this page is trying to make. The difference between a quick fix and a sheet you can trust is the extra minute you spend validating “multiple linear regression excel”. Start on a copy or a tiny sample, keep the affected cells visible, and compare the result with the tool above before you touch the real workbook. When a formula is involved, keep the inputs labelled beside it, reference cells instead of typing values, and apply number formatting only after the result checks out. The point is a visual that makes the number obvious at a glance, but the practical win is that someone else can open the file and understand what happened without asking you.

A worked example

Revenue in B2:B50 is modelled on ad spend in C and site visits in D. Data ▸ Data Analysis ▸ Regression with Input Y Range B1:B50, Input X Range C1:D50 and Labels ticked returns R Square 0.83, an ad-spend coefficient of 2.4 with a p-value of 0.004, and a visits coefficient whose p-value of 0.31 says it adds nothing once spend is in the model. The ToolPak output is the difference between an estimated relationship and a quantified one — the p-values are what stop a coincidence being presented as a driver. If there is any chance you will reuse this, drop it into a small template tab right now: a labelled input area on the left and the formula beside it, checked once against the tool above. Next time the same question comes up, the answer is a single paste away instead of a rebuild from memory.

In Google Sheets

Everything above works in Google Sheets too. Excel and Sheets share the formula syntax used here; only the surrounding menus are arranged differently. That portability is deliberate — learn it once and it follows you between the two tools and across Windows and Mac. Nothing on this page is behind a login: the tool runs entirely in your browser, the formula is shown in full with one-click copy, and the steps work the same on Windows and Mac. That is the whole promise here — the exact answer, a way to prove it on your own numbers, and just enough context to make it stick. Treat “multiple linear regression excel” as a small building block rather than a chore. Once the inputs sit in their own cells and the formula reads from them, the same setup answers a dozen related questions with a tweak, and Excel keeps every dependent figure current as the data changes. The tool above is there so you can rehearse and verify before committing anything to a real workbook; the steps and worked example are there so the logic sticks. Get it right once and it stops costing you time — it starts saving it, every time the question comes back around.

Common mistakes

  • Selecting non-adjacent predictor columns; both the ToolPak and LINEST need one contiguous X block, so copy the columns together first.
  • Reading LINEST's coefficients left to right in column order — it returns them in reverse, with the last predictor first.
  • Reporting a high R squared as proof of causation when the predictors were chosen after seeing the data.
  • Leaving strongly correlated predictors in the model, which makes individual coefficients unstable even when the fit looks excellent.

Frequently asked questions

Where is regression in Excel?

Data ▸ Data Analysis ▸ Regression, which appears only after the Analysis ToolPak add-in is enabled.

Is it available on a Mac?

Yes, the Analysis ToolPak ships with Excel for Mac 2016 and later and is enabled from Tools ▸ Excel Add-ins.

What does R squared tell me?

The share of the variation in the outcome the model accounts for. It always rises when predictors are added, so use Adjusted R Square to compare models of different size.

How do I get the equation without the report?

LINEST returns the coefficients and the intercept; SLOPE and INTERCEPT do the same for a single predictor.

Other ways people ask this

This guide also answers

  • how to do multiple linear regression in excel